Category: Post to Facebook

PROPONENTS of a hotel on a harbour-front block owned by business identity Paul Lionetti are on a collision course with powerful farming and transport groups over plans to allow apartments at the site prone to noise from trucks and trains that service the Port of Albany.

More than 40 objections have been lodged to plans by Foreshore Investments Albany Pty Ltd for permission to build up to 6800sqm of apartments on the 9599sqm block on Princess Royal Drive.

Southern Ports complains an acoustics assessment of the site is not detailed enough to recommend a noise control package for the hotel-cum-apartment block, which is on the main truck route to the port.

The WA Farmers Federation argues a memorandum of agreement negotiated in 2007 is “very specific in the prohibition of permanent residential activity and acknowledgement and respect for continuous heavy haulage road and rail access to the Port of Albany”.

“It is extremely disappointing that the City of Albany is considering changes to this agreement to allow permanent accommodation,” the lobby group laments.

“Our members have cited a number of examples where complaints from recently arrived residents in agricultural or other industrial areas have resulted in restrictions to operating hours and the imposition of curfews.

“The possibility of any such restrictions to port access in the future would be extremely detrimental to the agricultural industry in Albany and surrounding region.”

The Forest Industries Federation of WA says planned alterations to the memorandum are not adequate to assure its members’ ongoing freight operations.

The Freight and Logistics Council of WA says the plan would increase the number of permanent residents in areas exposed to the highest impact of freight transport noise and vibration, leading to calls for restrictions on adjacent rail and road operations.

“That outcome would be disastrous for the efficiency of the port and the international competitiveness of the goods it handles,” the group submits.

The Stirlings to Coast Farmers collective says its members strongly oppose apartments at the site, located immediately across Toll Place from Mr Lionetti’s Due South tavern.

“In our view, any changes made that put our members’ continued access to the port facilities at risk would be seen to demonstrate a strong disregard for the concerns of hard-working farmers in our region by the Albany City Council,” the collective asserts.

But TourismWA disagrees, advising the amendments would improve financial viability of the project, which the State Government tourism promotion arm sees as “an essential piece of Albany accommodation infrastructure”.

Foreshore Investments’ consultant planners Harley Dykstra argue apartments would “support the viable operation of these buildings, which have historically prevented the development of a hotel and short stay accommodation” on the vacant waterfront block.

An overall recommendation on the apartments is yet to be put to Albany’s mayor and councillors.

ZIP, zero, nada, none.

That’s how many bids the City of Albany has received in response to its glossy, nine-page call for proposals to privatise the name of Centennial Stadium.

At 2pm on June 28, The Weekender was the only public witness to an opening of proposals at the City’s North Road headquarters.

As the tender box swung open, an official peered in, locked the box up, stepped away, and said The Weekender’s poised pen and Spirax notepad would not be required.

In a major anti-climax, not one naming rights sponsor had been lured from the woodwork of corporate Albany.

On Tuesday, Acting City CEO Michael Cole confirmed no late proposals had been received either.

“The request for proposal process was delivered in line with the City’s sponsorship policy and was only the first step in seeking interest from prospective sponsors,” Mr Cole said.

“The City will continue to proactively seek interest from potential naming rights sponsors and is currently compiling a shortlist of potential targets.

“Whilst receiving a proposal would have been a positive outcome, the City held no expectations around achieving an outcome in this initial stage of the process.”

In an article that recently revealed the City’s plan to sell the arena’s handle (‘A stadium by any other name’ , June 21), President of the Albany Ratepayers and Residents Association Elizabeth Barton foresaw a vapid result.

“What?! $50,000 a year?” the former City councillor said when told of the minimum price sought.

“You’ve got to be kidding.

“This is Albany, not Perth.”

She said the name ‘Albany Oval’ would be preferable to any corporate moniker.

Asked if the City would consider giving the stadium a name that included ‘Albany’, ‘Great Southern’, or ‘South Coast’ – to promote the area to tourists and investors and recoup some pay-off from its substantial investment in the stadium – Mr Cole mostly repeated his answer to an earlier question.

“The City will continue to proactively approach and seek interest from potential naming rights sponsors in line with the City’s sponsorship policy and the criteria stated in the request for proposal process,” he said.

THE final draft structure plan for a five-star resort between Lake Vancouver and Goode Beach is now in the public realm – with a recommendation that the WA Planning Commission approve it in the face of almost 270 objections.

Last Thursday, The Weekender revealed that an Albany council planning committee would consider the planned resort on July 11 after City staff and councillors convened separate closed-door meetings with the Frenchman Bay Association and project proponents (‘Goode Beach plans progress’, June 28).

Now it can be reported that Ahola Planning and landowners Cherry Martin and Rolf Koch have achieved a recommendation of approval from Albany’s city planners for the controversial 51-unit blueprint.

The proponents’ 401-page report depicts a swimming pool, seven single-floor buildings and five double-floor buildings including a function centre and cafe-cum-dining area.

The City’s planners have provided responses to many of the 315 public submissions received on the resort.

Almost 270 submissions oppose the project, about 20 support, and about 30 provide advice or do not proffer a strong view either way.

Among respondents offering advice is the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions that advises it cannot comment on the resort’s impact on vegetation because a current flora survey was not conducted.

Contrastingly, the Frenchman Bay Association’s submission says the proponents “appear to want to sweep away all the environmental, social and fiscal risks identified in previous exhaustive investigations”.

“The FBA has recently been advised by the City of Albany planners that previous studies are not relevant, as the proposed resort ‘is a completely different proposal to previous proposals’ ,” the residents’ lobby group submits.

“The FBA, however, strongly disagrees with this statement, because the site is exactly the same as it was three decades ago.

“It is the size of the proposed resort, as described in the Structure Plan, that is different, not the site.”

A submission by the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation is even more frank.

“For the proponents of this development to dismiss state policies and instead state that they will plan and manage for a 50-year sea level rise is negligent to future owners and investors in the property as well as local and state government authorities that may be expected to protect the infrastructure from erosion,” the Department asserts.

“Managed retreat is not an option for this site which is constrained by the presence of Lake Vancouver.”

After being considered by the City’s development committee, the planners’ recommendation of approval, with many conditions, will be considered by the full council and a recommendation of endorsement or refusal passed to the WA Planning Commission.

If the Commission then approves the structure plan, detailed development plans will then need to be considered by a State-convened assessment panel before the Goode Beach resort proceeds.

 

Photo source: Ahola Planning development report

ALBANY city councillors have launched a bid to cut the speed limit in and around the Great Southern’s main commercial centre from 50kph to 40 kph.

At a council meeting on Tuesday night, Councillor Bill Hollingworth said reducing the current speed limit in Albany’s CBD by 10kph would be worth investigating.

His colleague Paul Terry said a trial could include York Street, the 100m of Albany Highway closest to the city centre, Lockyer Avenue, Aberdeen and Collie streets and “all streets in between”.

“But we can talk about that at a later date,” he added.

Cr Terry said that, if required, he would present a notice of motion at the next council meeting that a report be prepared to probe the “pros and cons” of a 40kph trial.

In other inner-Albany road news, for the second council meeting in a row Deputy Mayor Greg Stocks declared how good the recently controversial resurfacing of Middleton Road (‘Road repairs a crack-up’, 19 April) had turned out.

“The Wylie Crescent and Hare Street rat runs are now closed,” he quipped, alluding to the almost complete, runway-like surface of nearby Middleton Road.

He said the silky smooth tarmac would come up a treat “by the time we put the trees in there and get the finishing touches done”.

Cr Stocks said he’d received “only positive feedback” on the roadworks.

He congratulated chief city engineer Matthew Thomson on a job well done.

PROPONENTS of a five-star resort at Goode Beach and a residents’ lobby group critical of the project were preparing to make separate closed-door pitches to Albany’s mayor and councillors as The Weekender went to press last night.

City CEO Andrew Sharpe said a meeting between councillors and the Frenchman Bay Association would be closed to the public as it had been arranged at the Association’s request.

“The Frenchman Bay Association wanted an opportunity to present to councillors in a less formal setting to explain how they believe the proposal will impact on them,” he said.

“Given the volume of information they wished to share, a separate information session was considered appropriate.

“For balance, the development proponent has also been invited to present separately to councillors on the proposal and what they have done to address some of the concerns already raised throughout the process.”

Mr Sharpe anticipated a revised structure plan for the resort would be submitted to a meeting of the City’s Development and Infrastructure Services Committee on July 11.

“The public and other community members will be able to share their views in public question time at both the July committee and council meetings,” he assured.

Mr Sharpe said last night’s meetings would not be forums for the resort to be debated, but would give the applicant and Frenchman Bay Association the opportunity to be heard at length.

He said councillors would be allowed to ask questions to ensure they were fully informed before the matter returned to council.

“All councillors have been invited to attend the meeting and representatives of the city’s planning department will also attend to help clarify or explain anything process-related,” he added.

On behalf of the Association on Tuesday night, Goode Beach resident and former city councillor Roland Paver thanked officials for arranging the meeting.

The structure plan was set to be considered by councillors on November 28 ahead of referral to the Western Australian Planning Commission.

But the applicant – Margaret River-based Ahola Planning on behalf of landowner, Perth-based paediatrician Cherry Martin – withdrew the plan.

This was after the Department of Fire and Emergency Services raised concerns over emergency access to the site that sits between Lake Vancouver and the beach.

If the Planning Commission eventually approves the structure plan, detailed development plans will then need to be considered by a State-convened assessment panel before the luxury resort proceeds further.